Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005

Commission File No.0-25464

DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

500 Volvo Parkway, Chesapeake, VA 23320

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (757) 321-5000

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock (par value $.01 per share)

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on July 31, 2004, was $2,815,931,323 based on a $26.61 average of the high and low sales prices for the Common Stock on such date. For purposes of this computation, all executive officers and directors have been deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such executive officers and directors are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.

On April 13, 2005, there were 109,094,296 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans called for in Item 5 of Part II and the information called for in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III are incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held June 16, 2005, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than April 29, 2005.

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

A WARNING ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS: This document contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements address future events, developments and results. They include statements preceded by, followed by or including words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “view,” “target” or “estimate.” For example, our forward-looking statements include statements regarding:

You should assume that the information appearing in this annual report is accurate only as of the date it was issued. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

For a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could affect our future events, developments or results, you should carefully review the risk factors described below, as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 13. Our risk factors include:

3

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Our forward-looking statements could be wrong in light of these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The future events, developments or results described in this report could turn out to be materially different. We have no obligation to publicly update or revise our forward-looking statements after the date of this annual report and you should not expect us to do so.

Investors should also be aware that while we do, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts and others, we do not, by policy, selectively disclose to them any material nonpublic information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, shareholders should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any securities analyst regardless of the content of the statement or report. We generally do not issue financial forecasts or projections and we do not, by policy, confirm those issued by others. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not our responsibility.

INTRODUCTORY NOTE: Unless otherwise stated, references to “we,” “our” and “Dollar Tree” generally refer to Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Unless specifically indicated otherwise, any references to “2005” or “fiscal 2005,” “2004” or “fiscal 2004,” and “2003” or “fiscal 2003” relate to as of or for the years ended January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, respectively. Any reference to “2002” or “fiscal 2002” relates to as of or for the year ended December 31, 2002.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act are available free of charge on our website

4

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

at www.dollartree.com as soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing of such reports with the SEC.

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Since our founding in 1986, we have become the leading operator of discount variety stores offering merchandise at the fixed price of $1.00. We believe the variety and quality of products we sell for $1.00 sets us apart from our competitors. At January 29, 2005, we operated 2,735 single-price point stores under the names of Dollar Tree, Dollar Bills, Dollar Express, Only One Dollar, and Only $One.

Since 1986, we have evolved from opening primarily mall-based stores ranging between 1,500 and 2,500 selling square feet to opening primarily strip shopping center-based stores averaging 10,000 to 15,000 selling square feet. In the past five years, we gradually increased the average size of our stores as we improved our merchandise offerings and service to our customers. At December 31, 1999, we operated 1,507 stores in 33 states. At January 29, 2005, we operated 2,735 stores in 48 states. Our selling square footage increased from approximately 6.1 million square feet in December 1999 to 20.4 million square feet in January 2005. Our store growth since 1999 has resulted from opening new stores and completing mergers and acquisitions. We centrally manage our store and distribution operations from our corporate headquarters in Chesapeake, Virginia.

Change in Fiscal Year End

In January 2003, we changed our fiscal year end to a retail fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to January 31.

Business Strategy

Value Merchandise Offering. We strive to exceed our customers’ expectations over the variety and quality of products that they can purchase for $1.00 by offering items that we believe typically sell for higher prices elsewhere. We buy approximately 60% of our merchandise domestically and import the remaining 40%. Our domestic purchases include closeouts. We believe our mix of imported and domestic merchandise affords our buyers flexibility that allows them to consistently exceed the customer’s expectation. In addition, direct relationships with manufacturers permit us to select from a broad range of products and customize packaging and product sizes and package quantities that meet our customers’ needs.

Mix of Basic Variety and Seasonal Merchandise. We maintain a balanced selection of products within traditional variety store categories. We offer a wide selection of everyday basic products and we supplement these basic, everyday items with seasonal and closeout merchandise. We attempt to keep certain basic consumable merchandise in our stores continuously to establish our stores as a destination. Closeout merchandise is purchased opportunistically and represents less than 10% of our purchases. National, regional and private-label brands have become a bigger part of our merchandise mix.

Our merchandise mix consists of:

Our larger stores, which appeal to a broader demographic mix, carry more consumable merchandise than smaller stores. As a result, consumable merchandise has grown as a percentage of purchases and sales. The following table shows the percentage of purchases of each major product group for the years ended January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004:

5

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Convenient Locations and Store Size. We primarily focus on opening new stores in strip shopping centers anchored by mass merchandisers, whose target customers we believe to be similar to ours, and in neighborhood centers anchored by large grocery retailers. Our stores have proven successful in metropolitan areas, mid-sized cities and small towns. The range of our store sizes allows us to target a particular location with a store that best suits that market and takes advantage of available real estate opportunities. Our stores are attractively designed and create an inviting atmosphere for shoppers by using bright lighting, vibrant colors, decorative signs and background music. We enhance the store design with attractive merchandise displays. We believe this design attracts new and repeat customers and enhances our image as both a destination and impulse purchase store.

For more information on retail locations and retail store leases, see “ Properties.”

Profitable Stores with Strong Cash Flow. We maintain a disciplined, cost-sensitive approach to store site selection in order to minimize the initial capital investment required and maximize our potential to generate high operating margins and strong cash flows. We believe that our stores have a relatively small shopping radius, which allows us to profitably concentrate multiple stores within a single market. Our ability to open new stores is dependent upon, among other factors, locating suitable sites and negotiating favorable lease terms.

Our older, smaller stores continue to generate significant store-level operating income and operating cash flows and have some of the highest operating margins among our stores; however, the increased size of our newer stores allows us to offer a wider selection of products, including more basic consumable merchandise, thereby making them more attractive as a destination store.

The strong cash flows generated by our stores allow us to self-fund infrastructure investment and new stores. Over the past five years, cash flows from operating activities have exceeded capital expenditures.

For more information on our results of operations, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Results of Operations.” For more information on seasonality of sales, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations.”

Cost Control. We believe that substantial buying power at the $1.00 price point contributes to our successful purchasing strategy, which includes disciplined, targeted merchandise margin goals by category. We believe our disciplined buying and quality merchandise help to minimize markdowns. We buy products on an order-by-order basis and have no material long-term purchase contracts or other assurances of continued product supply or guaranteed product cost. No vendor accounted for more than 10% of total merchandise purchased in any of the past five years.

During 2002, we began to upgrade our supply chain systems and identified other processes that could be improved using technology. These new systems continue to provide us with valuable sales information to assist our buyers and improve merchandise allocation to our stores. Controlling our inventory levels will result in more efficient distribution and store operations.

Payroll and related costs are a significant component of our selling, general and administrative costs. Accordingly, we believe that more efficient use of labor hours in our stores could increase our profitability.

Information Systems. We believe that investments in appropriate technology help us to increase sales and control costs. In 2002, we implemented a new inventory management system. Our new system has allowed us to improve the efficiency of our supply chain, improve merchandise flow and control distribution and store operating costs.

In 2003, we piloted our automatic replenishment system. This system automatically reorders key items, based on actual store level sales and inventory. In 2004, we rolled out this system to additional stores and merchandise categories. In 2005, we expect to roll this system out to even more stores and more categories, up to 500 stock-keeping units. As we utilize this system, our store management has more time to focus on customer service.

Point-of-sale data allows us to track sales by merchandise category at the store level and assists us in planning for future purchases of inventory. We believe that this information will allow us to ship the appropriate product to stores at the quantities

6

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

commensurate with selling patterns. During the first half of 2004, we completed the roll-out of our point-of-sale systems to most of our stores.

Corporate Culture and Values. We believe that honesty and integrity, doing the right things for the right reasons, and treating people fairly and with respect are core values within our corporate culture. We believe that running a business, and certainly a public company, carries with it a responsibility to be above reproach when making operational and financial decisions. Our management team visits and shops our stores like every customer; we have an open door policy to all our associates; and ideas and individual creativity are encouraged. We have standards for store displays, merchandise presentation, and store operations. Our distribution centers are operated based on objective measures of performance and virtually everyone in our store support center is available to help associates in the stores and distribution centers get their jobs done.

Our disclosure committee meets at least quarterly and identifies and monitors our internal controls over financial reporting and ensures that our public filings contain discussions about the risks our business faces. We believe that we have the controls in place to be able to certify our financial statements. Additionally, we have complied with the updated listing requirements for the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Growth Strategy

Store Openings and Square Footage Growth. The primary factors contributing to our net sales growth have been new store openings, an active store expansion and remodel program and selective mergers and acquisitions. From 2000 to 2004, net sales increased at a compound annual growth rate of 16.7% and operating income increased at a compound annual growth rate of 11.2%. We expect that the substantial majority of our future sales growth will come primarily from new store openings and secondarily from our store expansion and remodeling program.

The following table shows the total selling square footage of our stores and the selling square footage per new store opened over the last five years. We began opening larger stores after the acquisition of 98 Cent Clearance Center in 1998. Our growth and productivity statistics are reported based on selling square footage prospectively because our management believes the use of selling square footage yields a more accurate measure of store productivity. The selling square footage statistics for 2000 through 2004 are estimates based on the relationship of selling to gross square footage.

We expect to increase our selling square footage in the future by opening new stores in underserved markets and strategically increasing our presence in our existing markets via new store openings and store expansions (expansions include store relocations). In fiscal 2005 and beyond, we plan to predominantly open stores that are approximately 10,000 selling square feet and we believe this size allows us to achieve our objectives in the markets in which we plan to expand. At January 29, 2005, 551 of our stores, totaling 36.4% of our selling square footage, were 10,000 selling square feet or larger.

In addition to new store openings, we plan to continue our store expansion program to increase our net sales per store and take advantage of market opportunities. We target stores for expansion based on the current sales per selling square foot and changes in market opportunities. Stores targeted for expansion are generally less than 4,000 selling square feet in size. Store expansions generally increase the existing store size by approximately 6,000 to 10,000 selling square feet.

Since 1995, we have added a total of 471 stores through four mergers and several small acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy has been to target companies with a similar single price point concept that have shown success in operations or provide a strategic advantage. We evaluate potential acquisition opportunities in our retail sector as they become available.

In 2004, we also acquired the rights to 42 store leases through proceedings associated with the bankruptcy of a former discount retailer. We will take advantage of these opportunities as they arise in the future.

7

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Merchandising and Distribution. Expanding our customer base is important to our growth plans. We plan to continue to stock our new stores with the ever-changing merchandise that our current customers have come to appreciate. In addition, we are opening larger stores that contain more basic consumable merchandise to attract new customers. Consumable merchandise typically leads to more frequent return trips to our stores resulting in increased sales. The presentation and display of merchandise in our stores are critical to communicating value to our customers and creating a more exciting shopping experience. We believe our approach to visual merchandising results in high store traffic, high sales volume and an environment that encourages impulse purchases.

A strong and efficient distribution network is key to our ability to grow and to maintain a low-cost operating structure. We opened two new distribution centers in 2004, Ridgefield, Washington and Joliet, Illinois, which was a replacement for our Chicago distribution center. We currently operate nine distribution centers. We believe, these distribution centers in total will be capable of supporting approximately $4.5 billion in annual sales. We expect to continue to add distribution capacity to support our store opening plans, with the aim of remaining approximately one year ahead of our distribution needs. Based on current plans, we will not need to add any distribution capacity in 2005. New distribution sites are strategically located to reduce stem miles, maintain flexibility and improve efficiency in our store service areas.

Our stores receive approximately 95% of their inventory from our distribution centers via contract carriers. The remaining store inventory, primarily perishable consumable items and other vendor-maintained display items, are delivered directly to our stores from vendors. For more information on our distribution center network, see “Properties.”

Competition

The retail industry is highly competitive and we expect competition to increase in the future. The value discount retail sector currently represents approximately 10% of the $300 billion discount retail market and appears to be the fastest growing sector. Our value discount retail competitors include Family Dollar, Dollar General, 99 Cents Only and Big Lots. The principal methods of competition include convenience and the quality of merchandise offered to the customer. Though we are a fixed-price point retailer, we also compete with mass merchandisers, such as Wal-Mart and Target, and regional discount retailers. In addition, several mass merchandisers and grocery store chains are now testing “dollar store” or “dollar zone” concepts in their stores, which will increase competition. Our sales and profits could be reduced by increases in competition, especially because there are no significant economic barriers for others to enter our retail sector.

Trademarks

We are the owners of federal service mark registrations for “Dollar Tree,” the “Dollar Tree” logo, “1 Dollar Tree” together with the related design, and “One Price...One Dollar.” A small number of our stores operate under the name “Only One Dollar,” for which we have not obtained a service mark registration. We also own a concurrent use registration for “Dollar Bill$” and the related logo. During 1997, we acquired the rights to use trade names previously owned by Everything’s A Dollar, a former competitor in the $1.00 price point industry. Several trade names were included in the purchase, including the marks “Everything’s $1.00 We Mean Everything,” and “Everything’s $1.00,” the registration of which is pending. With the acquisition of Dollar Express, we became the owner of the service marks “Dollar Express” and “Dollar Expres$.” We became the owners of the “Greenbacks All A Dollar” and “All A Dollar” service marks, with the acquisition of Greenbacks. We have applied for federal trademark registrations for various private labels that we use to market some of our product lines.

Employees

We employed approximately 11,040 full-time and 19,115 part-time associates on January 29, 2005. The number of part-time associates fluctuates depending on seasonal needs. We consider our relationship with our associates to be good, and we have not experienced significant interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements. None of our employees is subject to collective bargaining agreements.

8

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Stores

As of January 29, 2005, we operated 2,735 stores in 48 states as detailed below:

We currently lease our stores and expect to continue to lease new stores as we expand. Our leases typically provide for a short initial lease term (generally five years) with options to extend. We believe this leasing strategy enhances our flexibility to pursue various expansion opportunities resulting from changing market conditions.

As current leases expire, we believe that we will be able to obtain lease renewals, if desired, for present store locations, or to obtain leases for equivalent or better locations in the same general area. From time to time we may not comply with certain provisions of our store operating leases. We maintain good relations with our landlords and believe that violation of these provisions, if any, will not have a material effect on our operations.

Distribution Centers

The following table includes information about the distribution centers that we currently operate. We believe our distribution center network is capable of supporting approximately $4.5 billion in annual sales.

In addition to our distribution centers noted above, during the past several years we have used off-site facilities to accommodate limited quantities of seasonal merchandise.

With the exception of our Salt Lake City and Ridgefield facilities, each of our distribution centers contains advanced materials handling technologies, including automated conveyor and sorting systems, radio-frequency inventory tracking equipment and specialized information systems.

We have two former distribution centers for which we are liable for future rents. The leases on these facilities expire in June 2005 and September 2005. We recorded a charge of approximately $1.2 million in 2004 for our future obligation under the lease that expires in June 2005. We recorded a charge in 1998 for our future obligation under the lease that expires in September 2005.

9

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

For more information on financing of our distribution centers, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis - Funding Requirements.” For more information on our liability for future rents and related costs, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis - Inflation and Other Economic Factors.”

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are defendants in ordinary, routine litigation and proceedings incidental to our business, including allegations regarding:

We were sued in California in 2003 by a former employee who alleged that employees did not properly receive sufficient meal period breaks and paid rest periods. He also alleged other wage and hourly violations. The suit requests that the California state court certify the case as a class action. In 2005, we were threatened with a suit by former employees in Oregon who allege that they did not properly receive sufficient meal period breaks and paid rest periods. They also allege other wage and hour violations. We anticipate that they will request the Oregon state court to certify the case as a class action.

We were sued by Mag Instrument for damages, including treble damages, for the sale of 850,000 to 1,000,000 flashlights. The United States District Court in California has ruled that the flashlights infringe Mag’s patent. We intend to appeal this ruling. Mag also claims that the flashlights infringe its trademark. Mag Instrument’s damage expert claims that Mag is owed at least $4.16 for each unit we sold, plus enhanced or treble damages as well as its attorney’s fees. We believe that Mag has significantly overstated its damage estimate and that it is not entitled to an award of treble damages or attorney’s fees.

We will vigorously defend ourselves in these lawsuits. We do not believe that any of these matters will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. We cannot assure you, however, that one or more of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operation for the period in which they are resolved.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of our 2004 fiscal year.

10

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock has been traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market^® under the symbol “DLTR” since our initial public offering on March 6, 1995. The following table gives the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported by Nasdaq for the periods indicated.

On April 13, 2005, the last reported sale price for our common stock, as quoted by Nasdaq, was $24.80 per share. As of April 13, 2005, we had approximately 619 shareholders of record.

We had no stock repurchases in the fourth quarter of 2004. In November 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’s common stock. As of January 29, 2005, $113.3 million remained to be expended under this authorization.

In March 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common stock during the next three years. This new authorization terminated the previous November 2002 authorization. As of the termination date, the Company had repurchased 5,065,495 shares for approximately $142.0 million, under the November 2002 authorization. As of April 13, 2005, the Company had repurchased 2,048,900 shares for approximately $55.6 million under the March 2005 $300.0 million authorization.

We anticipate that substantially all of our cash flow from operations in the foreseeable future will be retained for the development and expansion of our business, the repayment of indebtedness and, as authorized by our Board of Directors, the repurchase of stock. Management does not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, our credit facilities contain financial covenants that restrict our ability to pay cash dividends.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents a summary of our selected financial data for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004 and the calendar years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. The selected income statement and balance sheet data have been derived from our consolidated financial statements that have been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial information found elsewhere in this report. As required by pooling-of-interests accounting, the financial information and operating data of Dollar Tree and our past merger partners, Dollar Express and Only $One, have been combined and restated as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.

For 2000, operating income was reduced by approximately $4.4 million and net income was reduced by approximately $3.1 million for charges related to the Dollar Express merger.

In our merger with Dollar Express in May 2000, the outstanding preferred stock of Dollar Express was converted to common stock.

11

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Comparable store net sales compare net sales for stores open throughout each of the two periods being compared, including expanded stores. Net sales per store and net sales per selling square foot are calculated for stores open throughout the period presented.

Amounts in the tables below are in thousands, except per share data, number of stores data, and net sales per selling square foot data. Prior year gross profit and selling, general and administrative amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year lease accounting changes. For more information on the lease accounting changes, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Footnote 1 in the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.”

12

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In Management’s Discussion and Analysis, we explain the general financial condition and the results of operations for our company, including:

As you read Management’s Discussion and Analysis, please refer to our consolidated financial statements, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, which present the results of operations for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, the one-month period ended February 1, 2003, and the calendar year ended December 31, 2002. In Management’s Discussion and Analysis, we analyze and explain the annual changes in some specific line items in the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year 2004 compared to the comparable fiscal year 2003 and the fiscal year 2003 compared to the fiscal year 2002.

Key Events and Recent Developments

Several key events have had or are expected to have a significant effect on our results of operations. You should keep in mind that:

13

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Overview

Our net sales are derived from the sale of merchandise. Two major factors tend to affect our net sales trends. First is our success at opening new stores or adding new stores through mergers or acquisitions. Second, sales vary at our existing stores from one year to the next. We refer to this change as a change in comparable store net sales, because we compare only those stores that are open throughout both of the periods being compared. We include sales from stores expanded during the year in the calculation of comparable store net sales, which has the effect of increasing our comparable store net sales. The term ‘expanded’ also includes stores that are relocated.

In fiscal 2004, we increased our selling square footage by approximately 21%. Of this 3.6 million selling square foot increase, approximately 0.9 million was added by expanding existing stores. While we met our square footage growth target in 2004, many of these stores opened later than planned during the year, resulting in lower overall sales than planned. Our net comparable store net sales increase for fiscal 2004 was 0.5%, which was lower than planned. If not for the positive effect of relocated stores, our comparable store net sales results would have been negative. In 2005, we will focus on reengineering our real estate process, which includes timely opening of new stores and relocated stores and have therefore planned for square footage growth of 14%-16%.

Most retailers have the ability to increase their merchandise prices or alter the mix of their merchandise to favor higher-priced items in order to increase their comparable store net sales. As a fixed-price point retailer, we do not have the ability to raise our prices. Generally, our comparable store net sales will increase only if we sell more units per transaction or experience an increase in transactions.

We expect the substantial majority of our future net sales growth to come from square footage growth resulting from new store openings and expansion of existing stores. We expect the average size of new stores opened in fiscal 2005 to be approximately 10,000 selling square feet per store (or about 12,500 gross square feet). We believe this size allows us to achieve our objectives in the markets in which we plan to expand. Larger stores take longer to negotiate, build out and open and generally have lower net sales per square foot than our smaller stores. While our newer, larger stores have lower sales per square foot than older, smaller stores, they generate higher sales and operating income per store and create an improved shopping environment that invites customers to shop longer and buy more. When our larger stores become the majority of our store base, which we expect to occur by the end of 2005, we believe our net sales per square foot will begin to rise.

We must control our merchandise costs, inventory levels and our general and administrative expenses. Increases in these expenses could negatively impact our operating results because we cannot pass on increased expenses to our customers by increasing our merchandise-selling price above the $1.00 price point.

Our point-of-sale technology provides us with valuable sales information to assist our buyers and to improve merchandise allocation to the stores. We believe that it will enable us to better control our inventory, which will result in more efficient distribution and store operations. During the first half of fiscal 2004, we completed the rollout of our point-of-sale systems to most of our stores. Due to the fact that this rollout is now substantially complete, we expect our depreciation expense as a percentage of sales to be about flat for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004.

Our plans for fiscal 2005 operations anticipate comparable store net sales increases of flat to slightly positive, net sales in the $3.4 to $3.5 billion range and diluted earnings per share of $1.77 to $1.87. We also expect a shift in the seasonality of our earnings in 2005. For example, the Easter selling season is 16 days shorter in the current year, impacting the first quarter of 2005, and there is an extra day between Thanksgiving and Christmas, which will impact the fourth quarter as compared to the prior year.

14

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

We recognized a one-time non-cash, after-tax adjustment of approximately $5.7 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, in the fourth quarter of 2004 to reflect the cumulative impact of a correction of our accounting practices related to leased properties. Of the aforementioned amount approximately $1.2 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, relates to the current year. This adjustment was made in light of the views, of the office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission, expressed in a letter of February 7, 2005, to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding the application of generally accepted accounting principles to operating lease accounting matters. Consistent with industry practices, in prior periods, we had reported straight line expenses for leases beginning on the earlier of the store opening date or the commencement date of the lease. This had the effect of excluding the pre-opening or build-out period of our stores (generally 60 days) from the calculation of the period over which we expense rent. In addition, amounts received as tenant allowances or rent abatements were reflected in the balance sheet as a reduction to store leasehold improvement costs instead of being classified as deferred lease credits. The adjustment made to correct these practices does not affect historical or future net cash flows or the timing of payments under related leases. Rather, this change affected the classification of costs on the statement of operations and cash flows by increasing depreciation and decreasing rent expense, which is included as cost of sales. In addition, fixed assets and deferred liabilities increased due to the net cumulative unamortized allowances and abatements. We believe that the new lease accounting practices will have a $0.01 per diluted share effect on 2005 earnings.

Results of Operations

The following table expresses items from our statements of operations, as a percentage of net sales:

Fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2004

Net Sales. Net sales increased 11.6% in 2004 compared to 2003. We attribute this $326.1 million increase in net sales primarily to new stores in 2004 and 2003 which are not included in our comparable store net sales calculation and to a slight increase in comparable store net sales of 0.5% in 2004. Comparable store net sales are positively affected by our expanded and relocated stores, which we include in the calculation, and, to a lesser extent, are negatively affected when we open new stores or expand stores near existing stores. If not for the positive effect of relocated stores, our comparable store net sales results would have been negative in 2004. Our stores larger than 10,000 square feet continue to produce our best comparable store net sales results.

15

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

The following table summarizes the components of the changes in our store size and count for fiscal years ended January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004.

Of the 3.6 million selling square foot increase in 2004, approximately 0.9 million in selling square feet was added by expanding existing stores.

Gross Profit. Gross profit margin decreased to 35.6% in 2004 compared to 36.4% in 2003. The decrease is primarily due to the following:

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, increased to 26.2% in 2004 compared to 25.9% in 2003. The increase is primarily due to the following:

Operating Income. Due to the reasons discussed above, operating income margin decreased to 9.4% in 2004 compared to 10.5% for 2003.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $1.9 million in 2004 as compared to 2003. This increase is due to increased debt in the current year and $0.7 million of deferred financing costs that were charged to interest expense as a result of the refinancing of the $150.0 million credit facility and the repayment of the $142.6 million of variable rate debt in March 2004.

Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was 37.5% in 2004 compared to 38.5% in 2003. The decreased tax rate for 2004 was due primarily to a one-time tax benefit of $2.3 million, or 80 basis points, related to the resolution of a tax uncertainty and approximately $0.6 million, or 20 basis points, related to tax exempt interest on our investments.

16

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 compared to fiscal year ended February 1, 2003

The following table is presented to compare statements of operations amounts for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 to the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003. Amounts for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003 are not included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on page 28.

Net Sales. Net sales increased 18.7% in 2003 compared to 2002. We attribute this $442.0 million increase in net sales primarily to new stores in 2003 and 2002 which are not included in our comparable store net sales calculation and to a comparable store net sales increase of 2.9% in 2003. Comparable store net sales are positively affected by our expanded and relocated stores, which we include in the calculation, and, to a lesser extent, are negatively affected when we open new stores or expand stores near existing stores. Our comparable store net sales increase was due to our expanded and relocated stores. Net sales in our larger, newer stores, particularly the stores over 10,000 square feet, have been stronger than those in our smaller, older stores.

The following table summarizes the components of the changes in our store size and count for fiscal years ended January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003.

Of the 3.6 million selling square foot increase in 2003, approximately 0.9 million selling square feet was added by expanding existing stores.

Gross Profit. Gross profit margin was 36.4% in 2003 and 2002. While gross profit margin remained consistent year to year, the changes in the components of gross margin are detailed below:

17

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, remained unchanged at 25.9% in 2003; the changes in the components of selling, general and administrative expenses are detailed below:

Operating Income. Due to the reasons discussed above, operating income margin was consistent at 10.5% for 2003 and 2002.

Interest Income and Expense. Interest income, as a percentage of net sales, was consistent at 0.1% in 2003 and 2002. Interest expense increased $3.6 million primarily due to the consolidation of our variable interest entity effective January 1, 2003.

Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was 38.5% in 2003 and 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our business requires capital to build and open new stores, expand our distribution network and operate existing stores. Our working capital requirements for existing stores are seasonal and usually reach their peak in September and October. Historically, we have satisfied our seasonal working capital requirements for existing stores and have funded our store opening and expansion programs from internally generated funds and seasonal borrowings under our credit facilities.

The following table compares cash-related information for the years ended January 29, 2005 and, January 31, 2004:

The $32.8 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2004 was primarily due to increased profitability before non-cash depreciation and amortization expense. Increased non-cash depreciation expense was primarily attributed to our square footage growth in 2004, two new distribution centers in the current year and our continued installation of our point-of-sale systems and other technology assets.

Cash used in investing activities is generally expended to open new stores and to expand or relocate existing stores. The $33.0 million increase in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily due to the following:

18

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

The $96.8 million change in cash provided by financing activities in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily the result of the following:

In March 2004, we entered into a five-year $450.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. This facility bears interest at LIBOR, plus 0.475% spread. We used availability under this facility to repay $142.6 million of variable rate debt related to our variable interest entity and to invest in certain short-term securities. As of January 29, 2005, we had $200.0 million available under this facility.

At January 29, 2005, our long-term borrowings were $269.0 million and our capital lease commitments were $12.7 million. We also have a $125.0 million Letter of Credit Reimbursement and Security Agreement, under which approximately $88.9 million was committed to letters of credit issued for routine purchases of imported merchandise.

In March 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300.0 million of our common stock during the next three years. This new authorization terminated the previous November 2002 authorization. As of the termination date, we had repurchased 5,065,495 shares for approximately $142.0 million under the November 2002 authorization. As of April 13, 2005, we had repurchased 2,048,900 shares for approximately $55.6 million under the March 2005 authorization.

19

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Funding Requirements

Overview

In 2004, the average investment per new store, including capital expenditures, initial inventory and pre-opening costs, was approximately $469,000. We expect our cash needs for opening new stores and expanding existing stores in fiscal 2005 to total approximately $138.6 million, which includes capital expenditures and initial inventory and pre-opening costs. Our estimated capital expenditures for fiscal 2005 are between $125.0 and $140.0 million, including planned expenditures for new and expanded stores and investments in technology. We believe that we can adequately fund our working capital requirements and planned capital expenditures for the next few years from net cash provided by operations and borrowings under our existing credit facilities.

The following tables summarize our material contractual obligations, including both on- and off-balance sheet arrangements, and our commitments (in millions):

Lease Financing

Operating Lease Obligations. Our operating lease obligations are primarily for payments under noncancelable store leases. The commitment includes amounts for leases that were signed prior to January 29, 2005 for stores that were not yet open on January 29, 2005.

Capital Lease Obligations (primarily sale-leaseback). In September 1999, we sold certain retail store leasehold improvements to an unrelated third party and leased them back for seven years. As a result of the transaction, we received net cash of $20.9 million and an $8.1 million 11.0% note receivable, which matures in October 2005. In 2004, we exercised the right to repurchase the leasehold improvements at October 31, 2005. In order to exercise this right, our lease obligation related to these improvements increased by $0.2 million. The total amount of the lease obligation at January 29, 2005 was $11.7 million. The obligation and the note receivable will both be satisfied at the buyout date of October 31, 2005.

Long-Term Borrowings

Revolving Credit Facility. In March 2004, we entered into a five-year Revolving Credit Facility (the Facility). The Facility provides for a $450.0 million line of credit, including up to $50.0 million in available letters of credit, bearing interest at LIBOR, plus 0.475%. The Facility, among other things, requires the maintenance of certain specified financial ratios, restricts the payment of certain distributions and prohibits the incurrence of certain new indebtedness. We used availability under this Facility to repay the $142.6 million of variable-rate debt and to purchase short-term investments. As of January 29, 2005, we had $250.0 million outstanding on this Facility.

20

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Revenue Bond Financing. In May 1998, we entered into an agreement with the Mississippi Business Finance Corporation under which it issued $19.0 million of variable-rate demand revenue bonds. We borrowed the proceeds from the bonds to finance the acquisition, construction and installation of land, buildings, machinery and equipment for our distribution facility in Olive Branch, Mississippi. At January 29, 2005, the balance outstanding on the bonds was $19.0 million. We begin repayment of the principal amount of the bonds in June 2006, with a portion maturing each June 1 until the final portion matures in June 2018. The bonds do not have a prepayment penalty as long as the interest rate remains variable. The bonds contain a demand provision and, therefore, outstanding amounts are classified as current liabilities. We pay interest monthly based on a variable interest rate, which was 2.57% at January 29, 2005. The bonds are secured by a $19.3 million letter of credit issued by one of our existing lending banks. The letter of credit is renewable annually. The letter of credit and reimbursement agreement requires that we maintain specified financial ratios and restricts our ability to pay cash dividends.

Commitments

Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds. Effective March 12, 2001, we entered into a Letter of Credit Reimbursement and Security Agreement, which provides $125.0 million for letters of credit, which are generally issued for the routine purchase of imported merchandise. Approximately $88.9 million was committed to letters of credit at January 29, 2005. We also have letters of credit or surety bonds outstanding for our revenue bond financing, our insurance programs and certain utility payment obligations at some of our stores.

Freight Contracts. We have contracted outbound freight services from various carriers with contracts expiring through January 2007. The total amount of these commitments is approximately $35.5 million.

Technology Assets. We have commitments totaling approximately $5.8 million to primarily purchase store technology assets for our stores during 2005.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We are party to two interest rate swaps, which allow us to manage the risk associated with interest rate fluctuations on the demand revenue bonds and a portion of our revolving credit facility. The swaps are based on notional amounts of $19.0 million and $25.0 million. Under the $19.0 million agreement, as amended, we pay interest to the bank that provided the swap at a fixed rate. In exchange, the financial institution pays us at a variable-interest rate, which is similar to the rate on the demand revenue bonds. The variable-interest rate on the interest rate swap is set monthly. No payments are made by either party under the swap for monthly periods with an established interest rate greater than a predetermined rate (the knock-out rate). The swap may be canceled by the bank or us and settled for the fair value of the swap as determined by market rates.

The $25.0 million interest rate swap agreement is used to manage the risk associated with interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our revolving credit facility. Under this agreement, we pay interest to a financial institution at a fixed rate of 5.43%. In exchange, the financial institution pays us at a variable-interest rate, which approximates the floating rate on the debt, excluding the credit spread. The interest rate on the swap is subject to adjustment monthly. The swap is effective through March 2006, but it may be canceled by the bank or us and settled for the fair value of the swap as determined by market rates.

Because of the knock-out provision in the $19.0 million swap, changes in the fair value of that swap are recorded in earnings. Changes in fair value on our $25.0 million interest rate swap are recorded as a component of “accumulated other comprehensive income” in the consolidated balance sheets because the swap qualifies for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 138. The amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the same period in which the related interest affects earnings.

For more information on the interest rate swaps, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”

21

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates. Certain of our estimates require a high level of judgment and have the potential to have a material effect on the financial statements if actual results vary significantly from those estimates. Following is a discussion of the estimates that we consider critical.

Inventory Valuation

As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, inventories at the distribution centers are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a weighted-average basis. Cost is assigned to store inventories using the retail inventory method on a weighted-average basis. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail ratio to the retail value of inventories. The retail inventory method is an averaging method that has been widely used in the retail industry and results in valuing inventories at lower of cost or market when markdowns are taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventories on a timely basis.

Inventory valuation methods require certain significant management estimates and judgments, including estimates of merchandise markdowns and shrink, which significantly affect the ending inventory valuation at cost as well as the resulting gross margins. The averaging required in applying the retail inventory method and the estimates of shrink and markdowns could, under certain circumstances, result in costs not being recorded in the proper period.

We estimate our markdown reserve based on the consideration of a variety of factors, including but not limited to quantities of slow moving or carryover seasonal merchandise on hand, historical markdown statistics and future merchandising plans. The accuracy of our estimates can be affected by many factors, some of which are outside of our control, including changes in economic conditions and consumer buying trends. Historically, we have not experienced significant differences in our estimates of markdowns compared with actual results.

Our accrual for shrink is based on the actual historical shrink results of our most recent physical inventories adjusted, if necessary, for current economic conditions. These estimates are compared to actual results as physical inventory counts are taken and reconciled to the general ledger. The majority of our counts are taken between January and May of each year; therefore, the shrink accrual recorded at January 29, 2005 is based on estimated shrink for most of 2004, including the fourth quarter. We have not experienced significant fluctuations in historical shrink rates in our Dollar Tree stores. However, we have sometimes experienced higher than typical shrink in acquired stores in the year following an acquisition. We periodically adjust our shrink estimates to address these factors as they become apparent.

Our management believes that our application of the retail inventory method results in an inventory valuation that reasonably approximates cost and results in carrying inventory at the lower of cost or market.

Accrued Expenses

On a monthly basis, we estimate certain material expenses in an effort to record those expenses in the period incurred. Our most material estimates relate to domestic freight, expenses related to our self-insurance programs, certain store level operating expenses, such as property taxes and utilities, and other expenses. Our freight and store-level operating expenses are estimated based on current activity and historical results. Our workers’ compensation and general liability insurance accruals are recorded based on actuarial valuation methods which are adjusted annually based on a review performed by a third-party actuary. These actuarial valuations are estimates based on historical loss development factors. Other expenses are estimated and recorded in the periods that management becomes aware of them. The related accruals are adjusted as management’s estimates change. Differences in management’s estimates and assumptions could result in an accrual materially different from the calculated accrual. Our experience has been that some of our estimates are too high and others are too low. Historically, the net total of these differences has not had a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Income Taxes

On a quarterly basis, we estimate our required tax liability and assess the recoverability of our deferred tax assets. Our taxes payable are estimated based on enacted tax rates, including estimated tax rates in states where our store base is growing applied to the income expected to be taxed currently. The current tax liability includes a liability for resolution of tax uncertainties. Management assesses the realizability of our deferred tax assets based on the availability of carrybacks of future deductible amounts and

22

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

management’s projections for future taxable income. We cannot guarantee that we will generate income in future years. Historically, we have not experienced significant differences in our estimates of our tax accrual. However, in 2004 we recognized a one time tax benefit related to the resolution of a tax uncertainty.

Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations

We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales, comparable store net sales, operating income and net income and expect this trend to continue. Our results of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including:

Our highest sales periods are the Christmas and Easter seasons. Easter was observed on April 20, 2003, April 11, 2004 and will be observed on March 27, 2005. Due to the 16-day shorter Easter selling season in 2005, we expect a smaller portion of our annual earnings to be realized in the first quarter of 2005 as compared to 2004. We generally realize a disproportionate amount of our net sales and a substantial majority of our operating and net income during the fourth quarter. In anticipation of increased sales activity during these months, we purchase substantial amounts of inventory and hire a significant number of temporary employees to supplement our continuing store staff. Our operating results, particularly operating and net income, could suffer if our net sales were below seasonal norms during the fourth quarter or during the Easter season for any reason, including merchandise delivery delays due to receiving or distribution problems or consumer sentiment.

Our unaudited results of operations for the eight most recent quarters are shown in a table in Footnote 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Inflation and Other Economic Factors

Our ability to provide quality merchandise at a fixed price and on a profitable basis may be subject to economic factors and influences that we cannot control. Consumer spending could decline because of economic pressures, including rising gas prices. Reductions in consumer confidence and spending could have an adverse effect on our sales. National or international events, including war or terrorism, could lead to disruptions in economies in the United States or in foreign countries where we purchase some of our merchandise. These and other factors could increase our merchandise costs and other costs that are critical to our operations, such as shipping and wage rates.

Shipping Costs. In the past, we have experienced annual increases of as much as 33% in our trans-Pacific shipping rates due primarily to rate increases imposed by the trans-Pacific shipping cartel. Currently, trans-Pacific shipping rates are negotiated with individual freight lines and are subject to fluctuation based on supply and demand for containers and current fuel costs. We imported 19,612 forty-foot equivalent containers in 2004 and expect this number to increase in fiscal 2005 proportionately to sales growth. As a result, our trans-Pacific shipping costs in fiscal 2005 may increase compared with fiscal 2004 when we renegotiate our import shipping rates effective May 2005. We can give no assurances as to the amount of the increase, as we are in the early stages of our negotiations.

Because of the increase in fuel costs throughout 2004 and the threat of continued increases in 2005, we expect increased fuel surcharges from our domestic contract carriers compared with past years. Based on current fuel prices, we estimate that the costs resulting from increased fuel surcharges may approximate $4.0 to $5.0 million in 2005. We expect to offset a portion of this potential increase with improved operational efficiencies, including improved routing and reduced distance between distribution centers and the stores that they service.

Minimum Wage. Although our average hourly wage rate is significantly higher than the federal minimum wage, an increase in the mandated minimum wage could significantly increase our payroll costs. In prior years, proposals increasing the federal minimum wage by $1.00 per hour have narrowly failed to pass both houses of Congress. However, if the federal minimum wage were to

23

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

increase by $1.00 per hour, we believe that our annual payroll expenses would increase by approximately 40 basis points, unless we realize offsetting cost reductions.

Leases for Replaced Distribution Centers. We are liable for rent and pass-through costs under two leases for now-closed distribution centers whose leases expire in June 2005 and September 2005. We have recorded charges to settle these estimated future obligations.

Unless offsetting cost savings are realized, adverse economic factors, including inflation in operating costs, could harm our financial condition and results of operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R). This statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Under the provisions of this statement, we must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method to be used at the date of adoption. The transition alternatives include retrospective and prospective adoption methods. Under the retrospective method, prior periods may be restated based on the amounts previously recognized under SFAS No. 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements) either for all periods presented or as of the beginning of the year of adoption.

The prospective method requires that compensation expense be recognized beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of this statement, for all share-based payments granted after the effective date, and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123, for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of this statement that remain unvested on the effective date.

The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal 2006 and we are currently evaluating the requirements of this revision and have not determined our method of adoption.

24

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to various types of market risk in the normal course of our business, including the impact of interest rate changes and foreign currency rate fluctuations. We may enter into interest rate swaps to manage exposure to interest rate changes, and we may employ other risk management strategies, including the use of foreign currency forward contracts. We do not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose other than cash flow hedging purposes and we do not hold derivative instruments for trading purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

We use variable-rate debt to finance certain of our operations and capital improvements. These obligations expose us to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. If interest rates increase, interest expense increases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease, interest expense also decreases. We believe it is beneficial to limit the variability of our interest payments.

To meet this objective, we entered into derivative instruments in the form of interest rate swaps to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from changes in the variable-interest rates on the obligations. The interest rate swaps reduce the interest rate exposure on these variable-rate obligations. Under the interest rate swap, we pay the bank at a fixed-rate and receive variable-interest at a rate approximating the variable-rate on the obligation, thereby creating the economic equivalent of a fixed-rate obligation. Under the $19.0 million interest rate swap, no payments are made by parties under the swap for monthly periods in which the variable-interest rate is greater than the predetermined knock-out rate.

The following table summarizes the financial terms of our interest rate swap agreements and the fair value of each interest rate swap at January 29, 2005:

Hypothetically, a 1% change in interest rates results in approximately a $0.4 million change in the amount paid or received under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements on an annual basis. Due to many factors, management is not able to predict the changes in fair value of our interest rate swaps. The fair values are the estimated amounts we would pay or receive to terminate the agreements as of the reporting date. These fair values are obtained from an outside financial institution.

25

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

26

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years ended January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, the one-month period ended February 1, 2003, and the year ended December 31, 2002. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years ended January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, the one-month period ended February 1, 2003 and the year ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated April 12, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company implemented the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as described in Note 12.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Norfolk, Virginia

April 12, 2005

27

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS